Michael Sandbergs Eval

I. What was the main point of the sermon (telos)?
What is the mission of the church in regards to doing justice in the world?

II. Textual Faithfulness (1-4):3
Comments:

III. Instruction (1-4):3

A. How did this sermon engage your mind?
I found myself very engaged.
B. Were you persuaded by the sermon’s main point?
Yes
C. Was the passage adequately explained?
I believe there was much more to be explained in the passage.

IV. Gospel Tone (1-4):3

A. Was Christ preached in this sermon?
Yes
B. Was the Gospel made clear as a challenge to unbelievers?
Not really - it could have been much clearer
C. Were the Gospel and its benefits preached to challenge, comfort, and encourage Christians?
I think the challenge overshadowed the comforts and encouragements

V. Communication

A. Movement
1. Introduction got my attention (1-4):2
2. Introduction laid foundation for the sermon (1-4):3
3. Did sermon have clear outline? (1-4):4
4. Sense of momentum? (1-4):3

B. Order and Unity
1. Main headings developed (1-4):3
2. Organized progression to sermon (1-4):3
3. Illustrations subservient to truth (1-4):3
4. Imperatives were specific (1-4):3
5. Transitions were clear (1-4):3
6. Was the sermon unified? (1-4):3
7. Length of sermon (1-4):

C. Point
1. Did the sermon affect you? (1-4):4
2. Was the sermon compelling? (1-4):4

D. Delivery
1. Language and vocabulary (1-4):2
2. Voice inflection/volume/clarity (1-4):3
3. Eye contact (1-4):3
4. Pulpit presence (1-4):2

VI. Overall Evaluation of sermon (1-4):2

I offer the following advice and suggestions to the preacher that he might continue to grow in effectiveness as a preacher: